Archive for the ‘Fat?So!’ Category
the following article appeared originally in sfweekly.com Mon., May 14 2012
Weight of the Nation Serves Up More Fat-Shaming
|photo by Mark Richards|
Today our nation relapses into what might be our worst case of fat fearmongering yet. The current source of our infection with pseudoscientific sensationalism is something called Weight of the Nation, a highly contagious conference/book/series/website onslaught backed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and delivered tonight and Tuesday (May 14-15) via ocular injection on HBO.
I attended the first, government-sponsored Weight of the Nation conference in 2009. I didn’t pay or anything self-defeating like that. I just walked in (with a brave friend or two) and delivered plastic-wrapped fortune cookies to the fancy luncheon tables where major stakeholders were about to chew on the alleged “obesity” problem. If the professional food scolds took a cookie, they got messages like these:
- The war on “obesity” is a war on PEOPLE!
- The No. 1 threat to fat people? Your unexamined prejudice.
- What’s the word for science that serves bigotry? Hint: It starts with “you.”
- If you can’t imagine fat people being healthy…that’s YOUR pathology!
- Tell people to lose weight if you want to endanger public health AND civil rights!
- How many fat people must you starve, poison, slice up? Celebrate weight diversity now!
And the Orwellian:
- Weight ≠ Health. Diversity ≠ Disease. Hate ≠ Help.
The wisdom of the fortune cookie didn’t deter them from three more years of scheming, so now we’ve got, Weight of the Nation.
On the Weight of the Nation website, the CDC calls its new hatefest “an unprecedented public health campaign.” Really? Let me list on my pudgy fingers a few of the more obvious public health campaigns attempting to herd us around this same mulberry bush:
• 1956: President Eisenhower establishes the President’s Council on Youth Fitness in response to fears that Americans are getting “soft.” The program celebrates its 50th anniversary in 2006, when people were still “soft.”
• 1994: The National Institutes of Health establishes WIN, the Weight-control Information Network. Because being fat is caused by lack of information.
• 1994: U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop launches “Shape Up America!” Eighteen years later, his campaign’s budget is in great shape.
• 2003: The CDC launches a $125 million anti-“obesity” ad campaign called “Verb, it’s what you do.” Because fat children, who are too stupid to understand nutrition labels, must surely obey the rules of grammar.
This list doesn’t include the plentiful state and local efforts to eradicate fat people. Clearly, for at least the past 60 years, fat people have not been welcome in America. Officially. The weight blame goes either to fat people personally, to the environment, or both. Either way, two-thirds of us (and at least a fifth of our children) aren’t welcome here. Though unwelcome, we’re sure useful as easy targets.
When the initial frenzy of Weight of the Nation has calmed down — after everyone has enjoyed this round of hating fat people and there’s been a healthy boost to budgets, profits, viewership, and ad revenue — I predict we’ll hit the same wall that every dieter encounters: the return to reality.
I suggest that reality is not so bad. To keep a grip, ask yourself:
- Would you question the motives behind any other national PR campaign designed “for your own good” by major media, corporations, and the government?
- If it were any topic other than weight (where you might feel vulnerable), would you be so quick to believe the numbers they cite to justify a “War on [Whatever]”? (Most egregious exaggerations: “Fat people cost ‘us’ billions!” “Everyone’s going to be really fat!” “Our children won’t live as long!”)
- Would you rather trust your own judgment about what’s good for you or get swept along by the latest fruitless panic?
- Do you want to connect with other people who are saying, “WTF” about Weight of the Nation?
Here are some:
Debate the Weight is a suite of data-supported arguments from the Association for Size Diversity and Health that controvert what they call “one of the most misleading and misguided public health campaigns — ever.”
Here’s a video from that group that’s way more fun than anything HBO will show. In it, one person confesses, “Health At Every Size liberates us from so much bullshit. It’s the big secret that I feel very smug to know and I want to spread it all around and not have it be a secret at all, ever again.”
Health At Every Size pioneer Deb Burgard offers a brilliant viewer’s guide on how to take care of yourself during the current hate campaign. She writes, “Blaming fatness keeps us from addressing the root causes of our problems and is clearly unfair to fat people. Many powerful people understand this but find it expedient to frame a problem in terms of fat in order to bring attention to it. They don’t think people will just attend to the real issue unless they whip up the fat panic. … I say, have the courage to make your argument about the real issues and stop doing it on the backs of fat people.”
Fall Ferguson lists the top 10 reasons to be concerned about the Weight of the Nationdocumentary on the Health at Every Size blog. Among other things, Ferguson writes, “Few things are as destructive to health and well-being as fear. I also question whether health professionals who use fear to influence people are behaving ethically.”
Nutrition professor Linda Bacon compares Weight of the Nation to bear-baiting in ancient Rome’s coliseum in today’s HuffPo. She writes, “Proponents may think they mean well by deploring the size of roughly half our nation, but it’s easier to rail about fat than examine the commercial and class motives that create the real health and wellness divides we live (and die) with.”
Dr. Deah’s Tasty Morsels blog critiques the media barrage. She writes, “If your position about obesity is based on concern for our health or presumed financial burden on society, I just ask you to read more than the one side of the story that you are being told over and over and over. Then, just as you would for an election, make your decision based on being informed.”
Jezebel editor Lindy West says “being mean to fat people is pointless.” And elaborates: “The assumption that you have a right to legislate another person’s body ‘for their own good,’ or ‘for the children,’ or even ‘because they’re gross,’ is its own kind of crazy — but to inflate that assumption to apocalyptic proportions, railing against the nation-obliterating medical bills of nebulous future straw-fatties, is fucking bonkers.”
Michele Simon, public health lawyer, gives great reasons why she is not attending or watching Weight of the Nation Including this one: “Scientific evidence shows that fat people have enough problems dealing with discrimination, bullying, etc., and the last thing they need is more fearmongering brought to you by the federal government and cable television.”
Slink magazine calls out weight-shaming as wholly unhelpful to health. Its rallying cry: “Because obesity, BMI, and all the other fad words you throw at plus-size women don’t stick or mean anything, and the moment we manage to hold off ridiculing women and our bodies long enough and alter the way we talk about plus size, fat, and our bodies to talking about healthy diet and exercise, the better off we will be.”
And isn’t that supposed to be the point? Y’know … wellbeing (and maybe even a bit of welcome) for all of us.
The following is stolen in its entirety from SF weekly. I’m sure Marilyn won’t mind and I don’t really care what the weekly thinks.
Five Things to Do in 2012 That Aren’t
Radical Weight-Loss Surgery
|photographer: Mark Richards|
|model: Marilyn Wann|
The U.S. Food and Drug Administrationtook note of the notorious billboards in early December. Regulators officially told marketing company 1-800-GET-THIN (and the eight clinics that take patient referrals from the ad campaign) that their ads do not adequately warn people about the risks of lap band surgery. They also found the billboards’ existing warnings too small to be legible.
This is the same FDA that in February approved use of the gastric girdle (aka lap band) at lower weights, making major surgery available to people whose clothing tags carry more than one X rating.
The promoters of stomach cinching (aka lap band) were given 15 days to respond or face monetary penalties and possible inventory seizure. The legal representative of 1-800-GET-THIN (who’s been cited in news reports as saying he is also president and CEO of the company) has said the ads will change, and one news report says a new warning has been placed on the company’s website.
The very idea of surgery of this nature reminds me of the bureaucrat’s mother in Terry Gilliam’s brilliant movie, Brazil. She pursues increasingly grotesque surgeries for her looks while increasingly menacing conduit tubes snake through the scenery. Is this really how we pursue health and beauty in our lives and in our landscapes?
Amid what seems like black comedy, I don’t want us to forget the five people who drove past 1-800-GET-THIN billboards in the LA area, underwent lap band surgery, and died.
Willie Brooks was a 35-year-old substitute school custodian. He was 5’6″ and weighed about 300 pounds. According to Los Angeles Times reports, he hoped that if he lost weight, he could get a permanent position. He went on a fishing trip with his wife, Okema, and their six children (then ages 14 to 20) the day before his June 5, 2009, lap band surgery. He died from peritonitis three days after the surgery.
Ana Renteria was a 33-year-old office worker who weighed 240 pounds. She was in constant pain after having lap band surgery in February, 2010, according to Los Angeles Times reports. Her surgeon told her that was how it would feel, her sister Noemi Luna recalled. Ten days post-surgery, she was dead from infection.
Laura Faitro was 50 years old, the primary caretaker for her blind husband living with chronic illnesses. She died five days after having lap band surgery on July 21, 2010. Doctors who treated her after the surgery found she had sepsis. “Faitro’s death certificate lists heart failure as the cause of death, with liver laceration and morbid obesity as contributing factors,” the Los Angeles Times reports.
Tamara Walter wanted to lose 50 pounds. She was a 52-year-old grocery store supervisor and a new grandmother. She had just bought a new house and had plans for travel and a new car. She had lap band surgery in late December, 2010, and entered cardiorespiratory arrest on the operating table. Her family discontinuled life support the day after Christmas, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Paula Rojeski was 55 when she had lap band surgery on Sept. 8, 2011. Surgery clinic workers called 911 and paramedics found her unconscious, not breathing, and with no pulse. She was pronounced dead at a nearby hospital, according to the Los Angeles Times report. It quotes her best friend Marni Rader, who said, “She was never married. She never had kids. Her dogs were her kids. That was her happiest moment, in the park with her dogs. She loved her dogs as much as she loved her family and friends.” Rojeski’s driver’s license listed her height as 5’5″ and Rader estimated she weighed 180 pounds.
I’m no medical authority, but if you’re looking for something fabulous to do for yourself in 2012, here are five suggestions that don’t involve risking death with lap band surgery, things I bet Willie, Ana, Laura, Tamara, and Paula would have liked to do a bit longer.
1. Go fishing. Take a friend or some family members along.
2. Go shopping. And have a leisurely lunch with your sister or your BFF.
3. Spend some time with someone who’s ill. They would appreciate the company.
4. Take your dog for a walk. Play fetch in the park. (No pets? Join a
friend when they walk their dog.)
5. Babysit your grandchild. Or plan an adventurous family outing.
Marilyn Wann has created something fabulous to do for yourself that
doesn’t involve lap band surgery — the 2012 FAT!SO? Dayplanner.
Brilliant documentary of my Fat Shero, Marilyn Wann.